The fossil was discovered by Charles Dawson in
1912, while digging in a gravel pit in a Little Village called Piltdown.
The fossil would have been the missing link between apes and humans and
the possibility of humans forming from early ape discoveries. By the
term "missing link", I mean it would have gave many scientist
proof that humans from the early century came from apes. Charles
Dawson invited Arthur Smith Woodworth and Father Pierre to join him in his
discovery in Piltdown. Arthur Smith Woodworth was the first to announce the
findings of the fossil in Piltdown at a meeting in December
1912 in front of the Royal Geology Society. Scientist cheered the news in and
were enthusiastic about the situation. Scientist end up discovering other human
like fossils in other countries like Asia and China which didn’t familiarize
with the discovery in Piltdown. It wasn't until 1953 when scientist came up
with a machine that gave better results in which they tested Charles Dawson
findings and found out his fossils were stained to make them appear as if they
were from the early century. Scientists had also discovered the teeth
on the jaw fossil had been filed down to make it seems as if it belonged to the
first humans when it belonged to no other than a female orangutan.
Charles
Dawson was trying to discover something first in London. There were early human
fossil findings, but never in London. Charles Dawson tricked many scientists
for about forty years for his early human discoveries, which were never found
after he passed away. Many scientist were extremely unhappy. They opened up a
case to determine who was behind the Piltdown Hoax. After this incident, it
made scientist question how many of Dawson’s discoveries were fraud.
Scientists
launched the first full scale analysis with better dating methods. Scientist were
able to determine how old a fossil was by measuring fluoride content of fossils.
Under a microscope they notice the teeth were shaved down, and that the jaw bone was
dated thousands of years ago. In which they noticed the
findings from Piltdown were forged.
No I would
not want to remove the human factor. Human’s play a huge role in science. Many
scientist have found many different aspects of the world just by looking for
the first findings of the early humans. Science comes with many errors, the
point of science is to come up with a theory and keep testing it until it
becomes right before you publish it.
I
believe taking information from unverified sources is wrong. The whole point of
science is being able to test your theory which helps you and others come up
with either the same conclusion or a brief argument with scientific proof that your
theory may have been wrong. I believed Dawson was wrong for tricking colleges and friends
into thinking his findings were legit when in reality, they were completely
fraud. Made many scientist question all his other memorable findings. I believe it is
best to leave a discovery alone without any proof backing up your theory.
Just some clarifications on your opening synopsis:
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, humans *are* apes, so saying that we have evolved from apes misconstrues our evolutionary relationship with our non-human relatives.
Second, by this time, our genetic relationship with non-human apes wasn't really in question. That is why is it incorrect to identify this fossil as a "missing link" as it's key significance. What science was still trying to understand was *how* humans evolved from that common ancestor. The significance of this find (had it been real) is that it supported Arthur Keith's idea that humans developed larger brains early in the evolutionary process. We know now that this is incorrect.
Other than these two important points, good synopsis.
The question about "faults" is asking for what motivated the people involved in this hoax. Yes, it is possible Dawson wanted to find the first English hominid (though we still aren't sure he was the culprit), but why did he want to be able to make that claim? Ambition? Greed? And why did the scientific community accept this find so quickly, with so little skepticism? There were two sides to this hoax, the perpetrators and those who didn't do their jobs and check the fossil find to validate it. It is important to understand the motivations on both sides.
Can you describe the dating method that uncovered the hoax? Also, why were they still studying this fossil find some 40 years after it was discovered? What positive aspect of science does this represent?
"Human’s play a huge role in science."
I agree, but so far, your post has focused on the negative aspects of that human role. Do humans bring positive aspects to the process of science? What about curiosity? Ingenuity? Can ambition be a positive thing if it drives you to try to find the answers to questions about human evolution?
Good conclusion.